·
JUDICIARY LECTURE 1
SALIENT FEATURES OF INDIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM
SALIENT FEATURES OF INDIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM
·
LEGAL ISSUES
·
SHASHI AGGARWAL LAW AND CLASSES
·
JUDICIARY IN ANCIENT SYSTEM
1. DEALS WITH
THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAWS THROUGH THE AGENCY OF LAW GIVERS OR THE COURTS
2. SYSTEM
PROVIDES THE MACHINERY FOR THE RESOLVING OF THE DISPUTES ON ACCOUNT OF
AGGRIEVED
3. INDIA HAS A RECORD LEGAL HISTORY STARTING FROM THE VEDIC AGES ( 1750-500 BCE)
4. SOME SORT OF
LAW MAY HAVE BEEN IN PLACE DURING 3000 BCE AND INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION
5. LAW AS A
MATTER OF RELIGIOUS PRESCRIPTION AND PHILOSOPHICAL DISCOURSE HAS AN ILLUSTRIOUS
HISTORY IN INDIA
·
HISTORY OF JUDICIAL SYSTEM
1. JUDICIAL
SYSTEM IN ANCIENT INDIA THAT IS PRE ISLAMIC INVASION
2. JUDICIAL
SYSTEM IN MEDIEVAL AGE
3. JUDICIAL
SYSTEM IN BRITISH RULE
·
INDIA HAS THE OLDEST JUDICIARY IN THE WORLD.
HISTORY OF INDIAN JUDICIAL TAKES US TO THE PAST WHEN MANU AND BRIHASPATI GAVE
US DHARMA SHASTRAS,NARDA AND SMRITIES
AND KAUTILYA THE ARTHASHASTRA
·
LAW IN BRITISH RULES INDIA
1. A SYSTEM OF LAW BASED ON RECORDED JUDICIAL
PRECEDENTS CAME TO INDIA WITH THE BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY
2. THE COMPANY
WAS GRANTED CHARTER BY KING GEORGE 1 IN 1726 TO ESTABLISH MAYOR’S COURTS IN
MADRAS,BOMBAY,CALCUTTA ( NOW CHENNAI,MUMBAI AND KOLKATA)
3. JUDICIAL FUNCTION
OF THE COMPANY WAS EXPANDED SUBSTANTIALLY AFTER ITS VICTORY IN BATTLE OF
PLASSEY AND THREE AND BY 1772 COMPANY’S COURTS WERE EXPANDED OUT FROM THREE
MAJOR CITIES
4. THE COMPANY
SLOWLY REPLACED THE EXISTING MUGHAL SYSTEM IN THOSE PARTS
5. FOLLOWING THE
FIRST WAR OF INDEPENDENCE IN 1857,THE CONTROL OF THE COMPANY TERRITORIES IN
INDIA PASSED TO THE BRITISH CROWN
6. SUPREME COURT
WERE ESTABLISHED REPLACING THE EXISTING MAYORAL COURT.
7. THESE COURTS
WERE CONVERTED TO THE FIRST HIGH COURTS THROUGH LETTERS OF PATENTS AUTHORIZED
BY THE INDIAN HIGH COURTS ACT PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT IN 1862
8. SUPERINTENDENCE
OF LOWER COURTS WERE DEPUTED TO THE RESPECTIVES HIGH COURT
9. DURING THE
RAJ,THE PRIVY COUNCIL ACTED AS THE HIGHEST COURT OF APPEAL
10. CASES BEFORE
THE COUNCIL WERE ADJUDICATED BY THE LAW LORDS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS
11. THE STATES
SUED AND WAS SUED IN THE NAME OF THE BRITISH SOVEREIGN IN HER CAPACITY AS
EMPRESS OF INDIA
12. THE DOORS OF
THE NEWLY CREATED SUPREME COURT WERE BARRED TO INDIAN PRACTITIONERS AS THE RIGHTS
OF AUDIENCE WAS LIMITED TO MEMBERS OF ENGLISH,IRISH AND SCOTTISH PROFESSIONAL
BODIES
13. LEGAL PRACTITIONER ACT OF 1846 OPENED UP THE PROFESSION OF NATIONALITY OR RELIGION
14. UNDER THE
SUPERVISION OF CHAIRMAN THOMAS BABINGTON
OF THE FIRST LAW COMMISSION MACAULAY,THE INDIAN PENAL CODE WAS DRAFTED.
15. THE CODE OF
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE WAS ALSO DRAFTED BY THE SAME COMMISSION AND OTHER STATUTES
AND CODES LIKE INDIAN EVIDENCE ( 1872) AND CONTRACTS ACT ( 1872)
·
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM TODAY
1. ONE OF THE
OLDEST LEGAL SYSTEM IN THE WORD TODAY AS THE PART OF THE INHERITANCE RECEIVED
FROM THE BRITISH
2. THE FRAMEWORK
OF THE CURRENT LEGAL SYSTEM HAS BEEN LAID DOWN BY THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM DERIVES POWER FROM IT
3. THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE COUNTRY
4. SOURCE OF THE
LAW CAME INTO EFFECT ON 26 TH JAN 1950
AND IS THE WORLD’S LONGEST WRITTEN CONSTITUTION
5. DEFINED
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE
PEOPLE AND DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES WHICH ARE THE DUTIES OF STATES
6. NOT ONLY LAID
THE FRAMEWORK OF INDIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM ,BUT ALSO LAID OUT THE POWERS,DUTIES
,PROCEDURES AND STRUCTURES OF THE VARIOUS BRANCHES OF THE GOVERNMENT AT THE
UNION AND STATE LEVEL
7. JUDICIAL
SYSTEM OF INDIA CONSISTS OF SUPREME
COURT,HIGH COURT AND DISTRICT COURT OR
SUBORDINATE COURT
8. THE COURT HAS
THE POWER TO MAKE DECISIONS AND ALSO ENFORCES THE LAW AND SOLVE DISPUTES
9. JUDICIARY
SYSTEM CONSISTS OF JUDGES AND OTHER MAGISTRATES THEY FORM THE BENCH OR THE CORE
OF THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM.
· SALIENT FEATURES OF INDIAN JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN INDIA
·
SETTING UP OF SINGLE INTEGRATED SYSTEM OF COURTS TO
ADMINISTER BOTH UNION AND STATE LAWS AND THE SUPREME COURT IS APEX COURT AND FOLLOWED BY THE THE VARIOUS HIGH COURTS AT THE STATE LEVEL AND BELOW THE HIGH
COURTS EXIST THE DISTRICT COURT AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL AND OTHER LOWER COURT
·
INDEPENDENCE OF JUDICIARY : THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA MAKES THE JUDICIARY TRULY INDEPENDENT AND IT PROVIDES FOR
:
1. APPOINTMENT
OF THE JUDGES BY THE PRESIDENT
2. HIGH QUALIFICATION
FOR APPOINTMENT AS JUDGES
3. REMOVAL OF
JUDGES BY A DIFFICULT METHOD OF IMPEACHMENT
4. HIGH
SALARIES,PENSION AND OTHER SERVICE BENEFITS
5. ADEQUATE
POWER AND FUNCTIONAL AUTONOMY FOR THE JUDICIARY
·
JUDICIARY AS THE INTERPRETER OF THE
CONSTITUTION: THE RIGHT TO INTERPRET AND CLARIFY THE
CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE SUPREME COURT. FINAL INTERPRETER OF THE
PROVISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONS OF INDIA
·
JUDICIAL REVIEW : THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS THE SUPREME LAW OF LAND. THE SUPREME COURT ACTS :
1. INTERPRETER
AND PROTECTOR OF THE CONSTITUTION
2. GUARDIAN OF
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE
3. EXERCISES THE
POWER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW HAS THE POWER TO DETERMINE THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY
OF ALL LAWS
4. CAN REJECT
ANY SUCH LAW WHICH IS HELD TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
5. HIGH COURT
ALSO EXERCISE THIS POWER
·
INDIA AS COMMON LAW :-COMMON LAW
SYSTEM IS DEVELOPED BY THE JUDGES,THROUGH THEIR DECISIONS,ORDERS OR JUDGEMENTS.
REFERRED TO PRECEDENTS. INDIAN LAW INCORPORATES THE COMMON LAW SYSTEM ALONG
WITH THE STATUTORY LAW AND REGULATORY LAW
·
ADVERSARIAL MODE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION :DESIGNED ON
THE BASIS OF ADVERSARIAL SYSTEM. WHERE
TWO ADVOCATES REPRESENT THEIR PARTIES POSITIONS BEFORE AN IMPARTIAL PERSON OR
GROUP OF PEOPLE USUALLY A JURY OR JUDGE
·
TWO SIDES IN EVERY CASE AND EACH SIDE PRESENTS ITS ARGUMENTS TO A NEUTRAL
JUDGE WHO WOULD THEN GIVE A ORDER OR A JUDGMENT BASED UPON THE MERITS OF THE
CASE
·
HIGH COURT FOR EACH STATE AS WELL A PROVISION FOR JOINT HIGH COURTS : THE CONSTITUTION LAYS DOWN THAT THERE IS TO
BE HIGH COURT FOR EACH STATE. TWO OR MORE STATES CAN BY MUTUAL CONSENT HAVE A
JOINT HIGH COURT
·
SUPREME COURT AS THE ARBITER OF LEGAL DISPUTES BETWEEN THE UNION AND STATES :
1. THE
CONSTITUTION GIVES TO THE SUPREME COURT THE JURISDICTION IN ALL CASES OF
DISPUTES
2. BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ONE OR MORE STATES
3. BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ANY STATE OR STATES ON ONE SIDE OR MORE STATES ON THE
OTHER
4. BETWEEN TWO
OR MORE STATES
·
GUARDIAN OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS :ACTS AS THE
GUARDIAN OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE. THE SUPREME COURT AND
HIGH COURT HAVE THE POWER TO ISSUE WRITS FOR THIS PURPOSE.
·
SEPARATION OF JUDICIARY FROM THE EXECUTIVE : THE JUDICIARY IS NEITHER A BRANCH OF THE EXECUTIVE NOE IN ANY WAY SUBORDINATES TO
IT. THE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION IN INDIA IS ORGANIZED AND RUN IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE RULES AND ORDERS OF THE SUPREME COURT
·
OPEN TRIAL : THE ACCUSED
IS ALWAYS GIVEN FULL OPPORTUNITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF AND THE STATES PROVIDE FREE
LEGAL AID TO POOR AND NEEDY
· JUDICIAL ACTIVISM :
1. MORE ACTIVE
2. THE SUPREME
COURT HAS BEEN COMING OUT WITH JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND DIRECTIVES AIMED AT
ACTIVE PROTECTION OF PUBLIC INTEREST AND HUMAN RIGHT
3. THE PUBLIC
INTEREST LITIGATION SYSTEM HAS BEEN PICKING UP
4. THE SYSTEM OF
LOK ADALAT HAS ALSO TAKEN A PROPER SHAPE AND HEALTH
·
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION SYSTEM :
1. COURT OF LAW
IN INDIA CAN INITIATE AND ENFORCE ACTION FOR SECURING ANY SIGNIFICANT PUBLIC OR
GENERAL INTEREST AFFECTED OR LIKELY TO BE THE ACTION OF ANY AGENCY PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE
2. ANY
CITIZEN,OR GROUP OR VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATION OR EVEN A COURT CAN BRING TO NOTICE
ANY CASE DEMANDING ACTION FOR PROTECTING AND SATISFYING A PUBLIC INTEREST
No comments:
Post a Comment