Ø
CA FOUNDATION BUSINESS LAW SERIES LECTURE 3
CLASSIFICATION OF CONTRACT 2
•
CONTENTS OF THIS LECTURE
1. DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN CONTRACT AND AGREEMENT
2. DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN VOID AND VOIDABLE CONTRACT
3. DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENTS AND ILLEGAL AGREEMENTS
4. DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN TRADITIONAL CONTRACT AND E CONTRACT
• DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONTRACT AND AGREEMENT
·
CONTRACT
1. SECTION 2(h)
OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 DEFINES AN AGREEMENT ENFORCEABLE AT LAW
2. A CONTRACT
INCLUDES AGREEMENT
3. EVERY
CONTRACT IS ENFORCEABLE
4. THE SCOPE OF
CONTRACT IS LIMITED AS IT INCLUDES COMMERCIAL AND LEGALLY ENFORCABILITY
5. IT HAS LEGAL
OBLIGATION
• AGREEMENT
1. SEC 2(e) OF
THE INDIAN CONTRACT 1872,EVERY PROMISE AND EVERY SET OF PROMISES FORMING THE
CONSIDERATION FOR EACH OTHER IS AN AGREEMENT.
2. EVERY
AGREEMENT IS NOT ENFORCEABLE.
3. THE SCOPE OF
AGREEMENT IS WIDE AS IT COVERS DOMESTIC AND SOCIAL AGREEMENT
4. AN AGREEMENT
MAY BE LEGAL OR ILLEGAL
5. NOT NECESSARY
FOR EVERY AGREEMENT TO HAVE LEGAL OBLIGATIONS
•
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AND VOIDABLE CONTRACT
•
VOID
CONTRACT
1. SEC 2(j) OF
THE INDIAN CONTRACT 1872, A CONTRACT CEASES TO BE LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE BY LAW IT
BECOMES VOID
2. INITIALLY IT
IS VALID LATER ON IT BECOMES VOID DUE TO SOME SUPERVENING IMPOSSIBILITY
3. CAN NOT BE
ENFORCED BY LAW AND THIRD PARTY DOES NOT GET ANY RIGHT
4. EVEN ON THE
EXPIRY OF THE TIME,IT CAN NEVER BECAME A VALID CONTRACT
5. A CONTRACT
WHICH IS VOID DUE TO ILLEGALITY ALSO AFFECT COLLATERAL TRANSACTIONS
•
VOIDABLE CONTRACT
- SEC 2(i) OF THE
INDIAN CONTRACT 1872,AN AGREEMENT WHICH IS ENFORCEABLE BY LAW AT THE OPTION
OF ONE OR MORE OF THE PARTIES,BUT NOT AT THE OPTION OF THE OTHER OR OTHERS
IS A VOIDABLE CONTRACT.
- IT IS VOIDABLE
AT THE OPTION OF THE AGGRIEVED PARTY AND REMAINS VALID TILL CANCELLED BY
HIM
- A THIRD PARTY
WHO DEALS IN GOOD FAITH BEFORE THE CONTRACT’S CANCELLATION ACQUIRES GOOD
TITLE.
- IT DOES NOT
AFFECT THE COLLATERAL TRANSACTIONS
•
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID CONTRACT AND VOID
AGREEMENT
•
VOID CONTRACT
1. SEC 2(j) OF
THE INDIAN CONTRACT 1872, A CONTRACT CEASES TO BE LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE BY LAW IT
BECOMES VOID
2. INITIALLY IT
IS VALID LATER ON IT BECOMES VOID DUE TO SOME SUPERVENING IMPOSSIBILITY
3. CAN NOT BE
ENFORCED BY LAW AND THIRD PARTY DOES NOT GET ANY RIGHT
4. EVEN ON THE
EXPIRY OF THE TIME,IT CAN NEVER BECAME A VALID CONTRACT
5. A CONTRACT
WHICH IS VOID DUE TO ILLEGALITY ALSO AFFECT COLLATERAL TRANSACTIONS
•
VOID
AGREEMENT
1. SECTION 2(g)
OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872,AN AGREEMENT NOT ENFORCEABLE LAW BY LAW IS SAID
TO BE VOID.
2. VOID
AGREEMENT IS VOID AB INITO
3. REMAIN ONLY
AGREEMENT AND NOT LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE
4. THEY ARE NULL
AND VOID AND WITHOUT LEGAL REMEDY
5. AN AGREEMENT
WITH MINOR IS VOID. THERE ARE CERTAIN AGREEMENT WHICH ARE DECLARED VOID BY THE
LAW
•
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENT AND ILLEGAL
AGREEMENT
•
VOID AGREEMENT
1. SECTION 2(g)
OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872,AN AGREEMENT NOT ENFORCEABLE LAW BY LAW IS SAID
TO BE VOID.
2. VOID
AGREEMENT MAY BE NOT BE ILLEGAL
3. PARTIES OF
VOID AGREEMENT MAY NOT BE PUNISHED
4. DOES NOT
AFFECT THE COLLATERAL TRANSACTIONS
•
ILLEGAL AGREEMENT
- AN ILLEGAL
AGREEMENT IS ONE WHICH IS NOT AS PER LAW OR VIOLATES THE RULES OF PUBLIC
POLICY OR CRIMINAL IN NATURE
- PARTIES TO
ILLEGAL AGREEMENT MAY BE LIABLE FOR PUNISHMENT
- ALL COLLATERAL
AGREEMENTS ALSO BECOME VOID
DIFFERENCE
•
E
CONTRACT
1. ON
LINE/COMPUTER GENERATED
2. DIGITAL
SIGNATURE
·
TRADITIONAL CONTRACT
1. WRITTEN/ORAL
2. HAND WRITTEN
SIGNATURE
No comments:
Post a Comment