• THEORIES OF ATTITUDE FORMATION
I. THEORIES OF ATTITUDE
COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY THEORIES
BALANCE THEORY
COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY THEORIES
BALANCE THEORY
II.
CONGRUITY THEORY
III.
AFFECTIVE COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY THEORY
IV.
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY
V.
FUNCTIONAL THEORY
VI.
SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY
•
COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY THEORIES
A.
PEOPLE SEEK CONSISTENCY AMONG THEIR ATTITUDES
AND BETWEEN THEIR ATTITUDES AND THEIR BEHAVIOR.
B.
PEOPLE SEEK TO RECONCILE DIVERGENT ATTITUDES
AND ALIGN THEIR ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR SO THAT THEY APPEAR RATIONAL AND
CONSISTENT.
C.
THERE IS INCONSISTENCY, FORCES ARE INITIATED TO
RETURN THE INDIVIDUAL TO AN EQUILIBRIUM STATE WHERE ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR ARE
AGAIN CONSISTENT.
•
BALANCE THEORY
A.
PROVIDED BY HEIDER
B.
CONCERNED WITH JUDGMENT OF PEOPLE/ISSUES THAT
ARE LINKED BY SOME FORM OF RELATIONSHIP
C.
THREE ELEMENTS IN THE ATTITUDE FORMATION:-
D.
THE PERSON
E.
OTHER PERSON
F.
IMPERSONAL ENTITY
G.
TWO GENERIC TYPES OF RELATIONSHIP:- SENTIMENT
RELATIONS AND UNIT RELATIONS.
·
BALANCE THEORY
- BALANCE EXIST IF ALL THREE RELATION ARE POSITIVE OR TWO RELATIONS ARE
POSITIVE AND ONE POSITIVE.
- IMBALANCE IF ALL THE THREE RELATION ARE NEGATIVE OR IF TWO RELATIONS
ARE NEGATIVE AND ONE POSITIVE.
- PEOPLE TEND TO PERCEIVE OTHERS AND OBJECTS LINKED TO THEM SO THAT THE
SYSTEM IS BALANCED.
- BALANCED STATES ARE STABLE AND IMBALANCES STATES ARE UNSTABLE
•
EXTENSION OF BALANCE MODEL. ABLERSON SUGGESTED:
IN COGNITIVE
STRUCTURE:-
a.
DENIAL
b.
BOLSTERING
c.
DIFFERENTIATION
d.
TRANSCEDENCE
•
CONGRUITY THEORY
a.
GIVEN BY OSGOOD AND TANNENBAUM
b.
SIMILAR TO THE BALANCE THEORY
c.
FOCUS IS ON CHANGES IN THE EVALUATION OF SOURCE
AND A CONCEPT THAT IS LINKED BY ASSOCIATIVE AND DISSOCIATIVE ASSERTION,
d.
CONGRUITY EXIST WHEN A SOURCE AND CONCEPT THAT
ARE LINKED BY POSITIVE ASSOCIATED HAVE EXACTLY THE SAME EVALUATION OR VICE VERSA
e.
CONGRUITY IS STABLE STATE AND INCONGRUITY IS
UNSTABLE AND INCONGRUITY LEADS TO ATTITUDE CHANGE.
•
AFFECTIVE CONGRUITY CONSISTENCY THEORY
a.
GIVEN BY ROSENBERG
b.
RELATED WITH THE CONSISTENCY BETWEEN A PERSON’S
OVERALL ATTITUDE OR EFFECT TOWARD AN OBJECT OR ISSUE AND HIS BELIEF ABOUT ITS RELATIONSHIP TO HIS MORE GENERAL VALUE.
c.
ALSO CALLED STRUCTURAL BECAUSE IT IS CONCERNED
MAINLY WHAT HAPPENED WITH IN INDIVIDUAL WHEN AN ATTITUDE CHANGES
d.
THE THEORY SUGGESTED THAT CHANGES IN AFFECTIVE
COMPONENT PRODUCES CHANGES IN THE COGNITIVE COMPONENT. ALSO SUGGESTED
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION.
•
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY
•
PROPOSED BY FESTINGER
•
IT STATES THAT THERE ARE THREE TYPES OF
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ALL COGNITIONS DISSONANCE,CONSONANCE AND IRRELEVANCE.
•
THE BASIC MODEL APPLIES TO SEVERAL SITUATIONS
AFFECTING BEHAVIOR OF PERSONS. IN EACH BEHAVOR,THE PERSON EXPERIENCES
DISSONANCE WHEN HE ENGAGES IN BEHAVIOR CONTRARY TO HIS ATTITUDES. SINCE
MAGNITUDE OF DISSONANCE IS A FUNCTION OF THE RELATIVE NUMBER AND IMPORTANT
ELEMENT. THE AMOUNT OF JUSTIFICATION A PERSON HAS FOR ENGAGING IN THE ATTITUDE
DISCREPENT BEHAVIOR IS AN IMPORTANT DETERMINANT OF THE AMOUNT OF DISSONANCE HE
EXPERIENCES.
•
FUNCTIONAL THEORY
•
HOW ATTITUDE AND EFFORTS ARE RELATED TO
MOTIVATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE INDIVIDUAL. THE THEORY FOCUSES ON THE MEANING OF
THE INFFLUENCE SITUATION IN TERM OF BOTH THE KIND OF MOTIVE THAT IS AROUSED AND
THE INDIVIDUAL’S METHOD OF COPING AND ACHIEVING HIS GOALS.
•
KATZ HAS SUGGESTED FOUR FUNCTIONS OF THE
ATTITUDE
I.
UTILITARIAN OR INSTRUMENTAL FUNCTION
II.
EGO DEFENSIVE
III.
VALUE ORIENTATION
IV.
KNOWLEDGE
•
KELMAN ‘S THEORY IS DIRECTED TOWARDS THE TYPE
OF SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP THAT OCCUR IN SOCIAL INFLUENCE SITUATIONS.
I. COMPLIANCE:-WHEN AN ATTITUDE IS FORMED OR
CHANGED IN ORDER TO GAIN A FAVORABLE REACTION FROM OTHER PERSON OR GROUP.
II.
IDENTIFICATION OCCURS WHEN A PERSON FORMS OR CHANGES HIS ATTITUDE
BECAUSE THIS ADOPTION HELPS HIM ESTABLISH OR MAINTAIN A POSITIVE SELF DEFINING
RELATIONSHIP WITH THE INFLUENCING AGENT.
III. INTERNALIZATION INVOLVE ADOPTING AN ATTITUDE
BECAUSE IT IS CONGRUENT WITH THE ONE’S OVERALL VALUE SYSTEM.
•
SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY
•
ORIGINALLY GIVEN BY SHERIF AND HOVELAND TRIED
TO EXPLAIN HOW EXISTING ATTITUDE PRODUCES DISTORTIONS OF ATTITUDINAL RELATED
OBJECTS AND HOW THESE JUDGMENT MEDIATE ATTITUDE CHANGES.
•
PERSON ‘S OWN STAND ON ISSUE THAT IS INITIAL
ATTITUDE.
•
POINT OF REFERENCE
•
ATTITUDINAL CONTINUUM
No comments:
Post a Comment