•ETHICAL THOEIRES
2
Ø NON CONSEQUENTIAL THEORY
( DEONOLOGICAL)
( DEONOLOGICAL)
•
GENERAL NORMATIVE THEORY OF MORALITY THAT IS
NOT CONSEQUENTIAL THAT DENIES THAT RIGHTNESS OR WRONGNESS OF OUR CONDUCT IS
DETERMINED SOLELY BY THE GOODNESS OR BADNESS OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACTS OR
OF THE RULES TO WHICH THESE CONFORMS.
•
DEONTOLOGICAL IS DERIVED FROM THE GREEK WORD
DEON WHICH MEANS DUTY. ACCORDING TO WHICH MORALITY OF AN ACTION SHOULD BE BASED
ON WHETHER THE ACTION ITSELF IS RIGHT OR WRONG UNDER A SERIES OF RULES RATHER
THAN BASES OF CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACTION.
•
FOR EXAMPLE IF WE TELL LIE IS WRONG MORALLY
THOUGH IT BRINGS HAPPINESS TO SOME PEOPLE. STILL IT IS WRONG.
•
W.D ROSS THE 20 TH CENTURY BRITISH PHILOSOPHER
HAS GIVEN THE FOLLOWING MORAL RULES:-
I.
DUTY OF FIDELITY:OBLIGATION TO KEEP PROMISES
AND SPEAK THE TRUTH
II.
DUTY OF CAUSING NO HARM TO OTHERS
III.
DUTY OF GOODNESS WHICH IMPLIES TO DO WHATEVER
WE CAN TO IMPROVE UPON THE CONDITION OF OTHERS
IV.
DUTY TO COMPENSATE FOR PEOPLE INJURY WHICH WE
MAY HAVE INFLICTED ON THEM WRONGFULLY
V.
DUTY OF GRATITUDE TO RETURN FAVOR OTHER TO US
VI.
DUTY OF JUSTICE TO ENSURE GOODS ARE DISTRIBUTED
ACCORDING TO PEOPLE’S MERITS
VII.
FAIRNESS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN GOODNESS
Ø
EVALUATION
q MERITS
a)
EASY DETERMINATION OF RIGHT OR WRONG ACTION ON
THE BASIS OF DUTIES( SOME ARE CLEARLY GIVEN BY RELIGION)
b) IRRELEVANT CONSEQUENCES
c)
PREDICTION OF BEHAVIOR IS EASY
d)
APPRECIATION OF GOOD MOTIVES DESPITE OF WHAT SO
EVER OUTCOME IS
q DEMERITS
1.
FAILS TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC AND ACCURATE CRITERIA
TO JUDGE OUR MORAL OBLIGATION AND MORAL CONFLICT
2.
IGNORE THE CONSEQUENCES
3.
NOT EQUIPPED TO RESPECT DIVERSE BELIEF
Ø
COMPARISON
q CONSEQUENTIAL THEORY
1.
EVALUATION OF ETHICAL CONTENT ON THE BASIS OF
CONSEQUENCES
2.
HYPOTHETICAL
3.
END OR OUTCOME ORIENTED
4.
CONSIDERS RIGHTNESS OF RESULT
5. MEASUREMENT OF ETHICAL VALUE IN TERMS OF
GOODNESS
6.
ADVOCATES INDIVIDUALISTIC APPROACH
•
NON CONSEQUENTIAL THEORY
1.
ON THE BASIS OF DECISION MAKING PROCESS
2.
CATEGORICAL
3.
MEANS ORIENTED
4. RIGHTNESS OF RULES
5.
IN TERMS OF METHOD APPLIED
6.
UNIVERALSALISM
Ø
OTHER NORMATIVE THEORIES
qSTOCK HOLDERS THEORY:-
•
ALSO KNOWN AS SHAREHOLDER THEORY ACCORDING TO
WHICH CORPORATIONS’S MANAGERS HAVE DUTY TO MAXIMIZE THE SHAREHOLDER’S RETURNS.
•
FIRST INTRODUCED BY MILTON FRIEDMAN IN THE 1960
•
CORPORATION IS PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE TO ITS STOCKHOLDER. MANAGERS ARE THE AGENT OF STOCKHOLDERS. THEIR SALARY IS APPROVED BY
THE SHAREHOLDERS AND THEY SHOULD WORK ACCORDING TO THE DICTATES OF THE
SHAREHOLDERS.
•
BUT IT WAS CRITICIZED ON OVER STRESSING OF SHAREHOLDER'S WEALTH MAXIMIZATION THEORY
•
NOT SUITABLE IN THE BUSINESS RUN BY FAMILY
q
STAKEHOLDER THEORY
•
BUSINESS MANAGERS HAVE AN ETHICAL DUTY TO BOTH
THE CORPORATION’S STOCKHOLDERS AS WELL AS THOSE INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS THAT
CONTRIBUTE TO THE COMPANY’S PROFITS AND ACTIVITIES AND THOSE WHO COULD BENEFIT FROM OR BE HARMED
BY THE COMPANY.
•
A CORPORATION’S STAKEHOLDERS INCLUDE:
•
THESE ARE THE PRIMARY BECAUSE SURVIVAL OF THE
FIRM DEPENDS UPON THEM:_
1.
STOCKHOLDERS
2.
EMPLOYEES
3.
SUPPLIERS
4.
CREDITORS
5.
CUSTOMERS
q
STAKEHOLDER THEORY
• SECONDARY STAKEHOLDERS OF A FIRM:-
I.
CONSUMERS
II.
MEDIA
III.
JUDICIARY
IV.
GOVT
V.
TRADE UNIONS
VI.
SOCIETY
VII.
ASSOCIATION ( TRADE /CUSTOMERS)
VIII. COMPETITORS
qCRITICISM
•
NOT PRACTICAL APPLICABLE
•
DIFFICULTY IN DEFINING THE CONCEPT
Ø
SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORY
•
IT PUTS AN IMPLICIT CONTRACT BETWEEN MEMBERS OF
THE SOCIETY AND THE BUSINESS HOUSES THE RIGHT TO EXIST IN RETURN FOR CERTAIN
SPECIFIED BENEFITS. SOCIAL CONTRACT REQUIRE:-
•
BENEFIT CONSUMERS
•
BENEFIT BY EMPLOYEES
•
MINIMIZE POLLUTION AND DEPLETION OF NATURAL
RESOURCES
IT FOCUSED ON AL BUSINESS ARE ETHICALLY DUTY BOUND TO ENHANCE THE WELFARE OF THE
SOCIETY BY CATERING TO ITS NEEDS.
IT IS CRITICIZED ON THE BASIS THAT CONTRACT IS
MORE OF FICTION THAN A TRUE CONTRACT.
Ø
DESCRIPTIVE THEORY
•
ALSO KNOWN AS COMPARATIVE ETHICS
•
IT IS THE STUDY OF HOW PEOPLE DO BEHAVE AND HOW
THEY THINK THEY SHOULD BEHAVE.
•
IT IS THE STUDY OF MORALITY AND MORAL ISSUES
FROM A SCIENTIFIC POINT OF VIEW. BRANCH OF ETHICS THAT ATTEMPT TO DEVELOP
CONCEPTUAL MODELS AND TEST THESE MODELS EMPIRICALLY IN ORDER TO ENHANCE OUR
UNDERSTANDING OF ETHICS OR MORAL BEHAVIOR AND MORAL DECISION MAKING.
•
IT EXPLAINS AS TO HOW ETHICAL DECISIONS ARE
ACTUALLY MADE IN BUSINESS AND WHAT IMPACTS THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME OF THOSE
DECISIONS.
Ø VIRTUE ETHICS THEORY
•
THAT EMPHASIZES AN INDIVIDUAL’S CHARACTER AS
THE KEY ELEMENTS OF ETHICAL THINKING RATHER THAN RULES OR THEIR CONSEQUENCES.
•
THIS THEORY HOLDS THAT A PERSON OF VIRTUOUS
CHARACTER WOULD NORMALLY ALWAYS MAKE RIGHT DECISION, NO NEED TO ASSESS THE
RULES OR CONSEQUENCES.
•
ONE SHOULD DEVELOP GOOD CHARACTER TRAITS SUCH A
HONESTY,KINDNESS ETC. MORAL CHARACTER RATHER THAN RIGHT ACTION IS FUNDAMENTAL
IN THIS THEORY.
No comments:
Post a Comment